Artificial Intelligence · 24.08.2026, 09:01 UTC
Adaptive Inference for Resource-Constrained Dynamic Pricing
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.LG ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 24.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2606.03736v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study resource-constrained dynamic pricing when the seller seeks revenue and valid inference about demand at a price fixed before the selling season. Depletion can remove every feasible price near the target, so randomization over the remaining prices need not preserve identification. We propose an inference-aware re-solving policy that checks target support before observing the current covariates and implements the fluid target load with a logged pricing mixture. In an affine binding-capacity family, target mass $t^{-\gamma}$ yields information $T^{1-\gamma}$, interval radius $T^{-(1-\gamma)/2}$, and regret $O(\log T+T^{1-\gamma})$ against the initial fluid optimum. In the same affine family, learned barycentric re-solving retains a target-local component of constant mass and, with polynomial error spending of exponent greater than one, achieves a linear information clock and $O(\log T)$ regret; slack-capacity local pricing gives the same orders. An exact-input smooth-frontier extension gives root-$T$ inference and $O(\log^2T)$ regret. Physical exclusion rules out uniformly shrinking intervals, while target mass of order $1/t$ alone yields bounded information. The policy reports an interval only after its prespecified support and information checks pass.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprints
- info Human-Level Text-to-SQL via Reinforcement Learning on Verified Data, Without Pipeline Engineering
- info Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks
- info When Better Teachers Don't Make Better Students: Revisiting Knowledge Distillation for CLIP Models in VQA