Artificial Intelligence · 24.08.2026, 06:46 UTC
AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 24.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2508.14313v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Test-time scaling strategies for Large Language Models predominantly rely on either reinforcement learning with sparse outcome rewards or search-based methods guided by static Process Reward Models. However, outcome-based RL often suffers from training instability and sample inefficiency, while static PRMs require expensive step-wise supervision and are susceptible to reward hacking due to distributional shifts. In this paper, we introduce AIRL-S, a unified framework that integrates Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Group Relative Policy Optimization. By inferring a dense, step-wise reward model directly from reference trajectories, AIRL-S eliminates the dependency on labeled process data and uses the same learned PRM as both a training signal and a verifier for search-based TTS. Extensive evaluations across eight benchmarks in mathematics, science, and code generation demonstrate that our policy model improves average performance by 9\% over the base model, matching GPT-4o. We further analyze how the AIRL and GRPO objectives complement each other and how the learned PRM transfers across generators and search algorithms, establishing a robust and cost-effective methodology for scaling test-time computation in complex reasoning tasks.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Bern2Edge: A Neurosymbolic Compiler for Edge Deployment via Bernstein Polynomial Networks
- info Metag: A dataset to build agentic meta-reviewing capabilities
- info Mutual information and sensitivity analysis for feature selection in customer targeting: a comparative study
- info When Clean Data Hurts: Learning with Monotone Corruptions Beyond Binary Classification