Artificial Intelligence · 31.08.2026, 07:03 UTC
Are These Modules Worth Their Cost? A Paradigm-Level Accuracy-Cost Analysis of In-context Learning Text-to-SQL
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.CL ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 31.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.28432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in in-context learning (ICL) text-to-SQL have substantially improved execution accuracy on public benchmarks by assembling increasingly elaborate pipelines around the base generator, yet existing studies typically report aggregate end-to-end accuracy, without quantifying the marginal accuracy-cost contribution of individual design choices. Consequently, providing a unified, paradigm-level cost-accuracy quantification remains a critical challenge for understanding and configuring modern text-to-SQL. To address this, we instantiate 17 paradigm-level configurations across five recurring modules of the ICL text-to-SQL pipeline under a single controlled implementation, and attribute each paradigm's marginal contribution and incurred cost across all four backbones spanning diverse capability levels and reasoning styles. Our analysis reveals that execution-feedback refinement is the only paradigm whose benefit holds universally at consistently low cost, while most other modules help only under backbone-dependent conditions. Token accounting shows that input demand is more closely tied to pipeline structure, whereas output demand is more sensitive to backbone generation behavior. Cross-module analysis further shows that stacking improves accuracy on most backbones, although how the gains compose varies with backbone capability. We also find that a fixed budget is often better spent engineering a more elaborate pipeline over a mid-tier backbone than upgrading to a frontier model with a lean pipeline. These findings …
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info LWiAI Podcast #255 - Gemini 3.7, Jalapeño, Qwen 3.8, Drones
- info OpenClaw Releases OpenClaw 2.0: Guided Model Setup, 575 ms Control UI Startup, and One Trust Boundary Per Gateway
- info When Stale Constraints Go Unchecked: Budgeted Verification Failures in Inherited Agent Memory
- info Set-shifting Behavioral Test for Harnessed Agents