Artificial Intelligence · 27.08.2026, 09:17 UTC
Clinically Grounded Privacy Evaluation of Medical LMs
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.CL ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 27.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2606.09590v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Medical language models (LMs) can memorize and reproduce protected health information, but privacy evaluations often focus on recovery of training text rather than disclosure under realistic threat models. We introduce a clinically grounded framework that evaluates leakage along a graded axis of adversarial access, ranging from publicly inferable demographics to leaked note fragments. At each tier, we measure verbatim memorization of patient-specific text and semantic leakage of sensitive diagnoses. Applying the framework to an LM continually pretrained on 378k clinical notes, we find that routine encounter metadata (i.e., name, date of birth, visit date, provider name, and practice location) elicits high rates of verbatim memorization across a patient's timeline and sensitive-diagnosis recovery (AUROC 0.91 for abortion, 0.82 for HIV). At the same time, exact-match memorization can overstate disclosure: 36% of memorized tokens reflect templated documentation. Our work highlights the risks of training on longitudinal clinical data and provides a practical, reusable framework for contextual privacy evaluation of medical LMs.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Google Research Introduces GlucoFM: A 0.72M-Parameter Dual-Stream Foundation Model for Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- info CuteTTS: Efficient and High-Quality Speech Synthesis via Autoregressive Modeling of Continuous Latents
- info SCHEDBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Constraint Faithfulness in Natural-Language Combinatorial Scheduling
- info Corpus2Skill: Distilling Enterprise Knowledge into Navigable Agent Skills for QA and RAG