Artificial Intelligence · 04.08.2026, 13:33 UTC
CLQT: A Closed-Loop, Cost-Aware, Strategy-Consistent Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Portfolio-Management Agents
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.LG ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 04.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2606.29771v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly cast as autonomous portfolio managers, and benchmarks have moved from financial question-answering to sequential trading. Yet most still rank agents by returns over a fixed window, a weak proxy: the market path dominates a period's return, and apparent alpha can dissolve once look-ahead leakage is controlled. We introduce CLQT, which reframes closed-loop trading evaluation as diagnosis before ranking: an instrument that localizes where and why an agent's process succeeds or fails. CLQT is a closed-loop, cost-aware, strategy-consistent, temporally-gated environment whose agents run a five-stage cycle: gather, synthesize, allocate, execute, reflect. Every round emits a DecisionRound sealed into a recompute-verifiable hash chain. Six pillars form the substrate: a TimeGate, transaction- and financing-cost modeling, strategy-consistency scoring, three-tier memory, a Model-Context-Protocol tool layer, and mandate-aware synthesis. The same agent runs structured or fully autonomous, making process scaffolding an experimental variable. From the audit trail we compute a five-axis capability scorecard (APM-CS: Coherence, Acuity, Composure, Discipline, Reliability), with Coherence partly judged by a held-out, out-of-cohort LLM. We validate CLQT on a contamination-controlled multi-model backtest with an ablation grid and a live broker track on unseen, post-cutoff data, against a repeated-run noise floor. Three findings illustrate the diagnosis-first read: the capability leader is not the Sharpe …