Do We Really Need Adaptive Global Spatial Attention for Traffic Forecasting?

Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.

Originaltext der Quelle (nicht übersetzt) – die deutsche Zusammenfassung findest du im Tab „Kurzfassung".

arXiv:2607.12462v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing traffic forecasting models commonly focus on extracting spatial dependencies, particularly global spatial information, which characterizes the representations obtained through interactions between each node and all nodes across the traffic network. However, the underlying mechanism by which global information is modeled and extracted remains insufficiently investigated. Whether global information must be extracted by high-degree-of-freedom adaptive attention or can be captured by a simple global aggregation operator remains unclear. For this purpose, we design a controlled ablation framework that replaces only the spatial mixing module to test attention-based global interaction. Across six traffic benchmarks, standard spatial attention yields relative MAE changes of $-1.58\%$ to $+1.26\%$ compared with uniform full-range mixing, and we observe no consistent advantage for standard spatial attention, while uniform full-range mixing reduces node-scale spatial-mixing complexity from $O(N^2)$ to $O(N)$. We further propose a hypothesized model that decomposes spatial attention into a row-uniform global background and a non-uniform residual. The residual shows dataset-dependent effects. Overall, uniform full-range mixing provides a strong global spatial baseline, while the non-uniform attention residual is not consistently beneficial across datasets.

Vollständiger Originalartikel ↗

• Betroffenheit im eigenen Stack prüfen: Versionen/Komponenten abgleichen.
• Originalquelle / Hersteller-Advisory lesen: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12462
• Verfügbaren Patch oder Workaround einspielen und dokumentieren.