Artificial Intelligence · 18.08.2026, 12:55 UTC
Exact Attention Sensitivity and the Geometry of Transformer Stability
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 18.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2602.18849v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop a sensitivity analysis for transformer attention in a geometry aligned with tokenwise computation. Our main result is the exact identity $\|J_\tau(u)\|_{\infty\to1}=\theta(p)/\tau$ for the Jacobian $J_\tau(u)$ of the tempered softmax $u\mapsto\mathrm{softmax}(u/\tau)$, where $\theta(p)=4\max_{S\subseteq[L]}p(S)(1-p(S))$ measures how evenly the attention distribution can be bisected rather than how concentrated it is. We combine this identity with a block-$\infty$/RMS norm under which row-stochastic attention mixing is nonexpansive. This yields a distribution-aware local Jacobian bound for multi-head attention and a sequence-length-independent Lipschitz bound on bounded input sets, with explicit dependence on width, input magnitude, temperature, and projection norms. We also identify a structural distinction between normalization placements: a pre-LN residual-sublayer Jacobian contains an additive identity term, whereas a post-LN residual-sublayer Jacobian does not. A LayerNorm projection lemma gives a sufficient condition under which the LayerNorm-only term in the post-LN expansion contracts geometrically; the condition is not tested by our experiments. Across three Pre-LN early-training runs of $774$M-parameter models, attention becomes substantially more concentrated while the median lower-bound certificate for $\theta(p)$ remains near one at every sampled layer and checkpoint. This certifies near-maximal exact sensitivity for at least half of the sampled rows within each layer. A minority of rows …