Artificial Intelligence · 25.08.2026, 10:31 UTC
Guided Action Flow: Q-Guided Inference for Flow-Matching Vision-Language-Action Policies
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 25.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2607.02092v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying a pretrained flow-matching vision-language-action (VLA) policy on a particular robot and workspace often calls for task-specific adaptation, while full- policy fine-tuning is costly and changes the base behavior. We present Guided Action Flow, an inference-time method that keeps a pretrained SmolVLA policy frozen and steers its reverse-time action-flow sampling with gradients from a task-specific action-chunk critic. QGF trains a visual Transformer critic and value model with offline Implicit Q-Learning on 100 real-robot rollouts. The critic conditions on robot state, frozen dual-camera SmolVLA visual tokens, and the policy's normalized 50-step action chunk. On a real-robot water-bottle placement task, QGF with \b{eta} = 2 increases success from 19/40 episodes (47.5%) to 34/40 episodes (85.0%) and reduces timeouts from 13 to 3. With a yellow tape measure added as a visual distractor, QGF completes 6/12 episodes, compared with 0/11 for frozen SmolVLA. These results show that deployment rollouts can provide an effective action-space guidance signal for improving a frozen flow-matching VLA without policy fine-tuning.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Can Large Language Models "Hyper-Thread"?
- info Context-Aware Cluster Decoding: Semantic Anchor-Driven Coherence in dMLLMs
- info When Not to Imitate: Boundary-Aware Skill Memory for Reliable Tool-Use LLM Agents
- info Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Sequential Activation Patching