DevOps / SRE / Platform · 17.08.2026, 20:55 UTC
Is Your New DevSecOps Tooling Reducing Work Or Just Adding to It?
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | DevOps / SRE / Platform |
| Quelle | DevOps.com ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 17.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
Security belongs in the software delivery pipeline. The harder question is where, how often and at what cost. Many pipeline teams eventually add security scanning to CI/CD, and relatively few go back afterward to measure what it actually cost the delivery process. Security coverage went up. Something else changed too, and it is rarely measured with the same rigor. “Shift left” gets treated as a free upgrade: catch problems earlier, at lower cost, with no real downside. That is true for the cost of fixing a vulnerability. It is not automatically true for the cost of running your pipeline. A security control can be worth adding and still change your delivery economics in ways worth naming honestly, rather than assuming they net out to zero. What Changes When Security Enters the Pipeline SAST, SCA, container scanning, secret scanning, and dependency analysis all do real work, and none of them are free to run. Each one is a pipeline stage with its own execution time, and many scale with codebase size or dependency count rather than staying flat. A scan that runs quickly on a small service can take meaningfully longer on a large monorepo, and image scanning in particular can grow with the number and size of layers in a container, not just the size of the application code itself. Findings from new scanners also generate new work: triage, false-positive review, and in some cases blocked builds while a team decides whether a flagged issue is real. Blocked builds mean retries. Retries mean re-running earlier pipeline stages that had already passed, which is easy to overlook if you …