Artificial Intelligence · 01.09.2026, 08:47 UTC
Learning Materials Properties from Scarce Labels and Unlabeled Crystals
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 01.09.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.30682v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Learning materials properties from scarce labels and unlabeled crystals is a central challenge for data-driven materials discovery. We present SemiMat, a controlled benchmark for semi-supervised materials property regression, and MatRank, a reliability-weighted objective for continuous pseudo-label uncertainty. SemiMat fixes labeled and unlabeled crystal inputs, graph-backbone interfaces, validation-only checkpoint selection, held-out test reporting, normalized MAE (NMAE), and method-rank summaries across six scarce-label tasks, four graph backbones, and five predefined split runs. MatRank builds pseudo-targets from labeled anchors, weights them by local reliability and weak-prediction agreement, trains weak and strong graph views consistently, and adds ranking signals so that unlabeled crystals shape both values and candidate order. Across the retained 24 backbone-task blocks, one fixed MatRank objective gives the lowest aggregate held-out test NMAE (0.896) and best average method rank (2.208). The component, OOD, and generated-pool diagnostics identify where the gain is reliable and where further screening evaluation remains necessary. Code is available at https://github.com/littlepeachs/SemiMat.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Towards Reliable, Generalizable, and Specific In-Context Knowledge Editing via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
- info post-graph-rag: A PostgreSQL-Native Bi-Temporal Graph RAG Engine with Temporal Grounding at Synthesis
- info SimGuide: Typed Multi-Context User Representations for Preference-Conditioned Agent Planning
- info When Seeing Is Not Enough: Benchmarking Interactive Visual Grounding in LVLMs