Artificial Intelligence · 01.09.2026, 07:03 UTC
Measurement Validity in LLM Cultural Alignment
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 01.09.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.29266v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers increasingly treat LLM survey responses as a proxy for human cultural values. This includes projecting model outputs onto instruments like the Inglehart-Welzel Cultural Map and drawing conclusions about which cultures a model resembles. While a model's answer to a value-laden questions may be interpreted as a cultural signal, it also carries sampling noise and, can be quite sensitive to question framing. In this paper, we separate survey responses, sampling noise and question framing for multiple LLMs. We decompose response variance from these models into variation across random seeds, prompt rewordings. We employ noise-to-signal ratio (NSR) to test whether a model's apparent cultural position is distinguishable from noise. When applied across a dozen models from four geographic origins, calibrated against 88 Integrated Values Survey countries, the answer is often no. NSR exceeds 1.0 on 49 of 117 valid model-question pairs (42%), reaching 5.56 in the worst case. Two models even refuse to answer sufficient number of survey questions outright. Our results corroborate previous findings that LLMs cluster toward Western, English-speaking cultural positions. However, what does not hold up in this study is the precision with which anyone can currently interpret a specific model's coordinates: prompt tone alone can shift a model by 2.4 map units, comparable to the distance between actual countries in the Inglehart-Welzel Cultural Map. These findings suggest that cultural attribution from LLM survey responses requires …
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Training-Free Action Correction for VLA Model Failures via Language Feedback
- info Influence Is Not Authority: When Causal Guardrail Signals Make Legitimate Tool Use Look Like an Attack in Tool-Using LLM Agents
- info AgenticRag-R1: Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Stack Memory for Multi-Step Reasoning, Retrieval and Memorizing
- info SUP-MIMIC: A Multi-Task Clinical Diagnosis Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Robustness to Contradictory Evidence