Artificial Intelligence · 01.09.2026, 11:03 UTC
Operationalising AI Regulatory Sandboxes: Activities, Requirements, and Technical Assessment under the EU AI Act
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 01.09.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2509.25256v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The systematic assessment of AI systems is increasingly vital as these technologies enter high-stakes domains. To address this, the EU's Artificial Intelligence Act introduces AI Regulatory Sandboxes (AIRS): supervised environments where AI systems can be tested under the oversight of Competent Authorities (CAs), balancing innovation with compliance, particularly for startups and SMEs. Yet significant challenges remain: assessment methods are fragmented, tests lack standardisation, and feedback loops between developers and regulators are weak. This paper operationalises the AIRS lifecycle. We map the sandbox journey into 29 concrete activities, from pre-participation guidance through application, preparation, participation, exit, and post-participation monitoring, and we distinguish between a Core AIRS centred on regulatory oversight and an Extended AIRS that additionally embeds structured technical testing through an AI Technical Sandbox (AITS). From this mapping we derive 15 infrastructural and governance requirements that an AITS must satisfy, each linked to the activities it supports and, for high-risk systems, to the provider obligations set out in Articles 9-15 of the AI Act. The framework aims to address multiple stakeholders: CAs gain structured workflows for applying legal obligations; technical experts can integrate robust evaluation methods; and AI providers access a transparent pathway to compliance. We conclude by outlining the Sandbox Configurator, an open-source framework intended to instantiate AITS …
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Relevance as a Vulnerability: How Web Retrieval Degrades Safety Alignment in LLM Agents
- info OISD: On-Policy Internal Self-Distillation of Language Models
- info Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning
- info Reverse Probing: Supervised Token-level Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models in Clinical Text