Artificial Intelligence · 28.08.2026, 11:05 UTC
Prediction of Prediction (PoP): Inter-Layer Activation Fusion for Single-Pass Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.CL ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 28.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.27165v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) routinely generate factually incorrect outputs with high decoding confidence, limiting their deployment in high-stakes workflows. Existing output-stage uncertainty metrics can fail when models are overconfident on false assertions, while multi-sample verification pipelines introduce substantial memory and latency overhead. This work evaluates whether internal hidden-state transition dynamics during generation can signal factual errors without auxiliary decoding calls. We introduce Prediction of Prediction (PoP), a mechanism that captures layer-transition uncertainty by fusing intermediate hidden representations across depth during a single forward pass. Evaluated on the TruthfulQA benchmark using autoregressive transformer backbones, PoP achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 75.5% for factual-correctness classification. The mechanism operates within the base forward pass, adding less than 1.2% runtime latency and requiring zero additional generation passes. The numerical results are reported from the author-verified experimental implementation and are bounded by the evaluation scope described below.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Google AI Releases Gemini 3.5 Transcribe: A Speech-to-Text Model Reporting 2.6% Average WER Across 85+ Languages
- info ET-Prune: Evidence-Aware Dynamic Budgeting for Visual Token Pruning in Text-Rich MLLMs
- info CultureVidBench: Benchmarking Cultural Understanding in Text-to-Video Generation
- info Not Truly Multilingual: Script Consistency as a Missing Dimension in VLM Evaluation