Artificial Intelligence · 28.08.2026, 06:17 UTC
RCMN: Understanding Misleadingness in Influential Public Discourse
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 28.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.27358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Influential public discourse shapes public beliefs and can also mislead, not only through what is stated, but also through how information is framed, omitted, contextualised, and communicated. Yet less research has focused on how such misleadingness arises and shapes the interpretations formed by readers. To address this gap, we introduce Reader-Centric Misleadingness Understanding (RCMN), a framework that operationalises misleadingness through five dimensions: misleading mechanism, likely reader interpretation, evidence-warranted interpretation, emotional arousal, and communicative intent. Based on this framework, we construct an evidence-grounded dataset of influential public discourse. Empirical findings show that misleadingness is diverse and extends well beyond fabrication, with unsupported inference, exaggeration, and omission among the prevalent mechanisms, and is frequently associated with heightened emotional arousal and distortive communicative intent. Moreover, we investigate whether lightweight claim-and-context representations retain sufficient cues for understanding reader-centric misleadingness without access to richer contextual, evidential, and multimodal information. Evaluation across five recent generative foundation models shows that reader-level interpretations can often be recovered from such limited representations, whereas identifying how misleadingness is produced remains considerably more challenging. These findings highlight the potential of lightweight representations for scalable misleadingness …
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info No Plan, Yet Human: A Reactive Robotics Model Predicts Human Planning Failures on a Clinical Task
- info MedFabric: Gold Evidence Hides the Difficulty of Word-Level Medical Fabrication Detection
- info MambaCSP: Hybrid-Attention State Space Models for Hardware-Efficient Channel State Prediction
- info MOMO: A framework for seamless physical, verbal, and graphical robot skill learning and adaptation