Artificial Intelligence · 28.08.2026, 10:49 UTC
Representing and Parsing Korean Constituency Structure at Different Levels of Granularity
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.CL ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 28.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.27035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Korean constituency parsing raises a representational challenge because the terminal units of a phrase-structure tree do not straightforwardly correspond to simple surface words. Korean eojeols are morphologically complex spacing units, and existing constituency resources differ in how they represent eojeol-internal morphology and non-overt elements. This paper compares three constituency parsing representations derived from the Penn Korean Treebank: Morpheme+XPOS, Eojeol+XPOS, and Eojeol+UPOS. We construct these representations by removing null elements, aligning Penn Korean phrase structure with overt eojeol tokens, preserving Penn Korean phrase labels where possible, and varying the terminal and preterminal layers. We then evaluate canonical non-binary transition-based constituency parsers in top-down, in-order, and bottom-up orders under a shared modeling and evaluation setup. All experiments use gold terminal segmentation and gold preterminal labels and therefore evaluate constituency parsing conditioned on gold morphosyntactic annotation. Eojeol terminals yield shorter transition sequences, but Eojeol+UPOS parsing substantially underperforms the morphologically richer conditions. Eojeol+XPOS narrows this gap, while Morpheme+XPOS gives the strongest results even after its predictions are projected to the eojeol terminal domain. Under these gold-annotation conditions, the results show that fine-grained morphological and XPOS representations provide valuable evidence for the evaluated parsers. This empirical finding …
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Google AI Releases Gemini 3.5 Transcribe: A Speech-to-Text Model Reporting 2.6% Average WER Across 85+ Languages
- info ET-Prune: Evidence-Aware Dynamic Budgeting for Visual Token Pruning in Text-Rich MLLMs
- info CultureVidBench: Benchmarking Cultural Understanding in Text-to-Video Generation
- info Not Truly Multilingual: Script Consistency as a Missing Dimension in VLM Evaluation