Artificial Intelligence · 01.09.2026, 07:03 UTC
SHADOWBENCH: Toward Reliable Automatic Evaluation of Semantic Alignment in Autoformalization
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 01.09.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.29270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autoformalization translates informal mathematical theorems into code for proof assistants such as Lean. A central challenge is that current evaluation metrics can accept type-correct but misaligned statements or reject correct statements written in a different formulation. Inspired by Pass@$k$, we propose SA-Pass (*Semantic Alignment Pass*), which tests formal statements using auxiliary statements called *shadows* that characterize the intended statement. A generated statement receives full credit only when it compiles, implies each shadow (forward check), and is implied by their conjunction (backward check). We instantiate SA-Pass in ShadowBench, a Lean 4 full autoformalization benchmark of 178 postgraduate- to research-level problems spanning eight mathematical areas. Claude Code (Opus 4.8) with Numina-Lean-Agent reaches $61.8\%$ compile rate and $11.2\%$ SA-Pass. Across outputs generated by six agentic configurations, SA-Pass achieves $98.8\%$ binary agreement with expert judgments. An early version of ShadowBench served as the benchmark for Track 4 of the ICML 2026 AI4Math Challenge.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Training-Free Action Correction for VLA Model Failures via Language Feedback
- info Influence Is Not Authority: When Causal Guardrail Signals Make Legitimate Tool Use Look Like an Attack in Tool-Using LLM Agents
- info AgenticRag-R1: Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Stack Memory for Multi-Step Reasoning, Retrieval and Memorizing
- info SUP-MIMIC: A Multi-Task Clinical Diagnosis Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Robustness to Contradictory Evidence