Artificial Intelligence · 28.08.2026, 07:02 UTC
The BS-meter: Detecting Politics and Labour through ChatGPT's Language
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 28.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2411.15129v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: What can we learn about language from studying how it is used by ChatGPT and other large language model (LLM)-based chatbots? In this paper, we analyse the distinctive character of language generated by ChatGPT, in relation to questions raised by natural language processing pioneer, and student of Wittgenstein, Margaret Masterman. Following frequent complaints that LLM-based chatbots produce "bullshit," in the sense of Frankfurt's popular monograph On Bullshit, we conduct an empirical study to contrast the language of 1,000 scientific publications with typical text generated by ChatGPT. We then explore whether the same language features can be detected in two well-known contexts of social dysfunction: George Orwell's critique of political speech, and David Graeber's characterisation of bullshit jobs. Using simple hypothesis-testing methods, we demonstrate that a statistical model of bullshit can reliably relate the Frankfurtian artificial bullshit of ChatGPT to the political and workplace functions of bullshit as observed in natural human language.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Scaling Model-Generated Distillation Data Can Make Latent Teacher Traits More Recoverable
- info A Layer Importance Metric for Quantization Accounting for the Speed-Quality Trade-off in Autoregressive Models
- info Mitigating Strong-Modality Collapse in Multimodal Learning via Inverted Asymmetric Fusion
- info When Is the Sharp Covariance Envelope Tight? Feature-Only Geometry for Volume-Sampled Least Squares