Artificial Intelligence · 26.08.2026, 08:17 UTC
What's the Catch? Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Vision-Language Models
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 26.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.23474v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on video and image-sequence benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they capture temporal structure. To study this question, we formulate temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem, providing a simple and controlled evaluation that directly tests sensitivity to temporal consistency. We introduce TimeCatch, where temporal anomalies are created by swapping consecutive frames and frame-level anomalies by replacing a frame with Gaussian noise. Models are evaluated on anomaly detection and localization tasks across four synthetic and real-world datasets, alongside a human study. Our evaluation reveals a substantial gap between frame-level and temporal anomaly detection. While VLMs consistently detect frame-level anomalies and often localize them accurately, they perform near chance on temporal anomaly detection and only modestly above chance on localization. Humans, in contrast, achieve near-ceiling performance on both tasks. Additional analyses across model scales, prompting strategies, sequence lengths, and visual similarity suggest that these failures cannot be explained solely by limitations in perception or model capacity. Together, these findings indicate that current VLMs can identify anomalies within individual frames but struggle to integrate information across frames to reason about temporal consistency. TimeCatch provides a controlled benchmark for evaluating temporal grounding in vision-language models.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Focal Calibration Loss: Controlling Posterior Distortion in Deep Neural Classifiers
- info Quantum Maximum Entropy Inference and Hamiltonian Learning
- info Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- info AdAdaGrad: Adaptive Batch Size Schemes for Adaptive Gradient Methods