Artificial Intelligence · 01.09.2026, 06:02 UTC
When Does Bigger Help? A Controlled Study of LLM Scale for Ontology Learning
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 01.09.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.31118v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The effect of Large Language Model (LLM) scale on ontology learning (OL) performance remains insufficiently characterized. We present a controlled evaluation of 13 models spanning dense and Mixture-of-Experts variants from the Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 lineages, together with proprietary GPT release variants, using the OntoLearner retrieval-augmented generation pipeline. All models are evaluated with the same embedding model, retrieval configuration, prompt templates, decoding settings, datasets, and metrics on term typing, taxonomy discovery, and non-taxonomic relationship extraction across four biomedical and materials science and engineering ontologies. Within the dense Qwen3.5 lineage, increasing parameter count primarily improves precision rather than recall, with the largest gains occurring between 9B and 27B parameters. However, the effect of scale is neither monotonic nor uniform across tasks and domains. Dense 27B models outperform substantially larger sparse models on term typing, whereas larger Mixture-of-Experts models achieve the strongest open-weight results on taxonomy discovery. Non-taxonomic relationship extraction remains difficult across model scales, particularly for the Materials Data Science ontology. Performance differences across matched Qwen variants and proprietary GPT releases further indicate that architecture and model lineage can outweigh nominal parameter count. These findings show that model size alone is an insufficient selection criterion for OL and provide empirical guidance for reproducible …
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info CGFM-Nav: Cognitive Graph-Field Memory for Semantic-Guided Lifelong Multimodal Embodied Navigation
- info Auditing and Mitigating Privacy Leakage in Cloud-Edge Collaborative Decoding
- info Development of an Autonomous AI Coding Agent using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and Gemini LLM Frameworks
- info Not All or None: Dynamic Construction of Target-aware Memory Graph for Conversational Stance Detection