Artificial Intelligence · 24.08.2026, 06:01 UTC
Target-Aware Calibration Data Selection for Preserving Uncertainty in Quantized Language Models
| Schweregrad | info |
|---|---|
| Kategorie | Artificial Intelligence |
| Quelle | arXiv cs.AI ↗ |
| Veröffentlicht | 24.08.2026 UTC |
Sicherheitsmeldung mit Schweregrad noch nicht bewertet. Technische Details im Tab „Originaltext“; empfohlene Schritte in der Checkliste.
arXiv:2608.21019v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantization is widely used to deploy large language models, but its effect on uncertainty behavior, such as confidence, margins, and abstention, is rarely treated as a primary objective. We frame calibration-data selection for quantization as a target-dependent uncertainty-preservation problem. Different deployments emphasize different regions of the input distribution, yet prior work mainly optimizes accuracy-oriented compression metrics or adjusts scores after quantization. We formalize this goal with distributional and boundary preservation risks, and provide a simple mixture-mismatch argument explaining why no single calibration recipe should be expected to fit all targets. We introduce Doubt-Preserving Quantization (DPQ), a lightweight pre-quantization recipe family that uses full-precision predictions to construct target-aligned calibration mixtures of high-doubt examples and generic anchors. Across 8 language models, 9 NLP benchmarks, and 22 comparison methods, the leading fixed recipe changes with the preservation target: DPQ-r75 leads on SQuAD2 answerability-boundary preservation, while milder or single-signal variants, including DPQ-r50, confidence-only, and entropy-only, better preserve broad multiple-choice QA behavior. These results show that calibration data should be selected for the specific full-precision score behavior a deployment needs to preserve, rather than treated as a fixed quantization detail.
Maßnahmen
⬇ Als MarkdownVerwandte Beiträge
- info Preference-Based Self-Distillation: Beyond KL Matching via Reward Regularization
- info RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs
- info Complete Cyclic Subtask Graphs for Tool-Using LLM Agents: Flexibility, Cost, and Bottlenecks in Long-Horizon Workflows
- info AutoOR: Scalably Post-training LLMs to Autoformulate Operations Research Problems